Here is a wireless lavalier (lapel mic) kit by Rode to help you get better audio on your videos. I harp a lot on the prevalence of bad sounding audio that so many people seem to have on their videos. It isn’t that hard or expensive to get awesome quality on videos. See my post, How To Get Good Audio On Your Videos on ways to do this. There’s even a video of my talking head with both good and bad audio so you can hear the effect of some of the solutions. Anyway…
One of the ways I mention for improving the quality of the audio on your videos is to use a lavalier microphone, also known as a lapel microphone. This gets the mic close to your mouth, which is the key to better audio. And wireless kits like the RodeLink Wireless Filmmaker’s Kit allow the speaker to move around the room without worrying about wandering too far away from the mic. Plus they are more convenient than setting up a boom mic stand with a shotgun mic.
I’ve used a fairly cheap wireless lav kit called the Azden WMS-Pro, which runs only $149.70. It’s terrific for people like me who don’t shoot video more than few times a month. But it isn’t very rugged. I’d want something better if I were shooting video in the field and doing it super often. The RodeLink Wireless kit is $394, but offers more features and can stand up better to everyday use.
DSLR Video Shooter did a review – video and article – on the RodeLink kit, which you can read (and watch) all about here: http://dslrvideoshooter.com/rodelink-wireless-filmmakers-kit-review/
So here is yet another way to sound professional AND look professional by making sure you have better audio on your videos.
World's First Dual Diaphragm Dynamic Microphone
The Shure KSM8 Dualdyne microphone is the world’s first dual diaphragm dynamic microphone. This is pretty exciting stuff! Why? Well I should try to start at the beginning…sort of.
Okay, first you whould know the difference between a dynamic and a condenser mic. You can review our post – What Is the Difference Between Condenser and Dynamic Microphones? to do that. Basically, if you see someone holding a mic while singing live, that’s a dynamic mic (almost certainly). So the new Dualdyne mic is one of those.
Next, as you may have guessed form the title of the post, dynamic mics have always had only one diaphragm, which is the thing inside the mic that vibrates when you sing into it. Shure has sort of led the way in dynamic mic design, starting way back in 1939 with the Shure 55 “fatboy Elvis mic” (no comment about anyone’s weight or anything:-P). It was the world’s first single-element unidirectional microphone. That mic was designed to reduce feedback on stage and really was the foundation for every dynamic mic that came after. You can get a modern version of that here.
Then in 1964, Shure came out with the SM-57 and the SM-58 mics, which are so ubiquitous (they’re everywhere) that I’d be surprised if YOU didn’t have at least one of them in your house somewhere. the SM-58 was the first ice cream cone-shaped hand-held mic and continues to be the most popular live mic around.
These directional mics had what is called a “cardioid” pickup pattern, which means it is most sensitive in the front (where you would bite the ice cream), and least sensitive (which means it rejects sound – good for avoiding feedback and noise) from the rear – the area at the point of the cone would be. But this creates a well-known phenomenon called “proximity effect,” which means that as your mouth gets closer to the mic, it sounds deeper and muddier.
Shure had been looking for ways to deal with this, among other improvements in the hand-held dynamic mic and came up with the idea to put a second diaphragm inside the mic. In so doing, they ended up having to redesign everything inside the mic to make it happen. And the result is the KSM8 Dualdyne microphone, which, as we’ve mentioned, is the first-ever dual diaphragm dynamic microphone.
I will be acquiring one for review purposes in the coming weeks. Until then, check out the video below from Shure about the new mic. And if you want to learn more or buy one right now, CLICK HERE.
MIDI Recording – What Is It And Why Is It Awesome?
You may not be new to MIDI recording, but you may still not know what MIDI is or why it is so cool. MIDI is an acronym having to do with music and computers, but nobody ever really uses the full name so why confuse the matter? What? Because you’re curious? Okay, but it really doesn’t matter. People pronounce the acronym “middee.” It stands for Musical Instrument Digital Interface. There. Now you can impress your friends. But I digress.
I want you to know what you can do with MIDI, and not have to use the word “protocol” even once…err…twice. What it comes down to is a collection of things that are really useful. So instead of trying to define MIDI, I’ll just describe several things and hopefully build a rapid picture of why MIDI is awesome.
The Matrix
Have you ever wished that like in the move, “The Matrix,” you could just know how to fly a helicopter, or play a fiddle, is seconds just by clicking a button on a computer? MIDI is sort of like that, though no surgery should be required. Let’s say you’re recording a song on your home studio and decide the song really needs a fiddle part (or sax, or trumpet, etc.). You could try to play it yourself. Shyaa! Your cat never forgave you for your fiddle attempt that last time. You could find someone who plays the fiddle. That’s preferable, but not always practical. It certainly takes a lot of time and effort. Or you could “build” the fiddle part you’re hearing in your head a few notes at a time on a piano-type keyboard (which will be saved as a MIDI file, “*.mid”), load up fiddle MIDI instrument (say, using Garritan Personal Orchestra virtual instruments) on your computer, and skidoosh! You, via your computer, have just added a fiddle part to your song.
Like A Word Processor For Music Recording
In the old days, if you wanted a pretty document all done in gothic script, you had to get a special pen and actually write it by hand. If you wanted the same words in a different font, say, a brush-stroke script, you had to rewrite the entire document with a different pen! But in the age of word processors all you have to do is go back to the original document and switch fonts. The job is done in seconds.
It used to be kind of the same way with music (and still is when using live musicians). Let’s say you got a friend to play that fiddle part on your recording. After 57 listens to the song, you realize it should have been a sax playing those notes instead of a fiddle! Holy crap, now what? You don’t know any sax players. You don’t have time to search for one, or money to pay for a studio musician. MIDI to the rescue! On your computer, open that MIDI file that plays the notes you put together for the fiddle earlier. Now load up a sax MIDI instrument on your computer (say, using Garritan Jazz and Big Band 3) and the same MIDI file will play the same part, but as a sax this time! It is like changing fonts on a word processor. Cool huh?
But MIDI Instruments Sound Bad, Don’t They?
Oh the innocence of blossoming knowledge. Many people are familiar with the music sounds that have come built in to most computer sound cards for decades now. Some of these sounds don’t sound very good, it’s true (though you can get some pretty interesting sounds). The “guitar” instrument sounds about as much like a guitar as the guitar setting on my grandmother’s organ. Some folks have come to associate the term MIDI with THOSE sounds. So in their minds, “MIDI instruments sound bad.” If you would like to have your world-view altered, let me introduce you to “virtual instruments!”
Virtual Instruments
For many years now, software programs called virtual instruments have been available that will play MIDI files and sound amazingly or even exactly like whatever real instrument you need. In fact, in some cases, it IS the real instrument (what?)! Yeah, some of these programs have actual recordings of THAT instrument that play when a MIDI file tells it to. This is one of the coolest things in the universe. And I will wax poetic about this kind of virtual instrument in another article (sorry;)).
Like any program, some are better than others, and cost varies from free to quite expensive. Either way, most sound infinitely better than the cheesy sound card instruments.
Correction Fluid For Your Song
I’ll mention one last awesome thing about MIDI, though the topic is vast and we’ve just scratched the surface here. Going back to the document metaphor…if any of you are old enough to remember, there used to be a magical thing called “correction fluid” that you could cover up mistakes with on a printed document. If you made a mistake, you could just dab some of this white paint over the mistake, let it dry, then go back and type the correct word over it. It prevented you having to start all over again from scratch. Are you sensing there is a MIDI comparison coming up?
Let’s say you have a MIDI file (basically bars on a graph representing musical notes) of “Those Endearing Young Charms.” (Bugs Bunny fans unite!) The computer is playing back just fine and then THAT NOTE hits. You know…the one that causes the piano to explode? Well, on your computer, it just causes a really sour note. If the sound being played back had been recorded audio (wave, mp3, etc.), you’d have no choice but to re-record the part to fix the note. But since it’s a MIDI file playing a virtual instrument, all you have to do is open the MIDI file on your screen, and drag the not to the right line. Bada-boom! Now the right note plays and nobody gets blown up. MIDI prevented you having to start all over again from scratch.
I hope the above information was enough to get you excited about MIDI. It wasn’t an exhaustive thesis (which would have been exhausting, trust me), but you should get the idea of some of the awesome things you can do with MIDI. And I didn’t have to say the word “protocol.”
Can you record and edit MIDI in Reaper? Why yes. Yes you can. And speaking of that…
If you’d like to learn how to use MIDI, check out our new home recording course, The Newbies Guide To Audio Recording Awesomeness 2: Pro Recording With Reaper Software – we have a 3-part lesson that shows you how to insert MIDI files into a project, record your own MIDI files, and use them to play virtual instruments (we use free virtual instruments in the course so you don’t have to buy any). We also give you so drums to use with Reaper’s ReaDrums feature. The course is a series of tutorial videos for only $47.
Condenser vs Dynamic Microphones
Ken wrote an article on the difference between dynamic and condenser mics in our post, What Is the Difference Between Condenser and Dynamic Microphones? And because it is often useful to read different “takes” on the same topic, we’ve linked below to an article from About.com that goes over the difference between the 2 main kinds of microphones, dynamic and condenser (yeah yeah, I know ribbon mics should be considered a 3rd “main type” but…) It is a good idea to understand these differences so you’ll know when and when not to use one or the other.
For those folks hoping to land voice over jobs with their microphones, for example, you almost certainly will need to use a condenser mic.
Here is the article: http://homerecording.about.com/od/microphones101/a/mic_types.htm
Cheers!
Ken
My First Home Music Recording – How I Split Myself in Three
It took over 20 years to get here – to a place where I have done so much audio recording (some of it really bad at first:)) that I can teach others how to do it without having to go through all the technical translation and trial/error. You can use my learning curve.
But why did it take so long and how did I get started? Well, I was a geeky teenager with only one thing I thought I was good at…music! I was mainly a singer, which eventually landed me the girl…but geeky high school boys who sing? Well, not all that sexy. ANYWAY…..
I sang all the time, much to the chagrin of…well…anyone who was around me really. Not because I sucked (at least I didn’t think I did;)), but because for some reason, someone apparently deemed bursting into song in public places some sort of social no-no. Whatever. It didn’t really stop me. In fact, when I was in 8th grade, singing solo was not enough for me any more! ”Without Love,” by the Doobie Brothers, just sounded so naked without the other voices. And none of my friends…I mean NONE…even knew what I was talking about when I mentioned harmony. The best I could manage was for THEM to sing the melody (read: LEAD VOCAL), so the one of us who knew how could sing at least ONE harmony could do so. But this was completely unsatisfactory. If creating real live harmony meant giving up the lead vocal AND only ending up with 2 parts (almost all wicked cool harmony has at least 3 parts), I had to find a better way.
I began to fantasize about ways to sing harmony with myself! Maybe there was a surgery…or some sort of mystical ventriloquist trick I could learn to sing harmony lines with myself. That alien on Battle Star Galactica could do it! Ehhh, but she had 3 mouths. No fair! Sigh. Then one day I was digging (very innocently, of course) through my parent’s garage looking for nothing in particular. What I found was something very interesting…A TAPE RECORDER. I started playing with it and soon realized that I could at least solve ONE of my current harmony woes…I could sing the lead vocal part AND one harmony! Still only 2 parts, and it would be somewhat “less-than-live”, exactly 50% less I guess;). But who cares, I could sing along with my own voice and thought it was cool. But it was not AWESOME. I now wanted AWESOME.
Seals and Crofts were cool. Simon and Garfunkel were cool. But “Carry On Wayward Son,” by Kansas was AWESOME. “Dance With Me,” by Orleans was also awesome. What was different about THOSE songs? 3-part (at least) harmony! I needed it… I was haunted by it. I started hearing 3 and 4-part harmony everywhere…The Eagles, Yes, The Beatles, The Mamas and the Papas, Asia, Van Halen, CSN, The Who. The weird thing was…I seemed to be the only person who could hear it! I’d learn all 3 parts and try to teach them to my friends who actually could sing. I failed. They just didn’t get it. AAARRRGGGHHH!
Then one day I noticed that my brother had a small radio that ALSO had a tape player in it. And there was a little flat round thing that said “mic” under it. Huh? It didn’t LOOK like a mic. But when I pushed the “record” and “play” buttons down at the same time, it recorded what I was saying. Cool! Oops. I seem to have just recorded over my brother’s ELO tape! Maybe he won’t notice. Maybe he’ll decide he doesn’t like ”Evil Woman” any more. Maybe he won’t notice that it was MY voice inserted in the middle of the chorus. Or maybe I could just arrange for the tape to disappear. After all, it was HIS fault. Who buys a cassette album and doesn’t poke out the tabs on the top that prevent you recording over it? No matter, I had made the ultimate discovery…how to sing 3 and 4 part harmony WITH MYSELF. Muhuhwhahahaha!
I set my tape recorder up and recorded myself playing acoustic guitar and singing “This Boy,” by the Beatles. Then I put a BLANK tape into my brother’s boom box, put it next to my purloined ancient tape recorder, pressed the “record/play” buttons, then played the tape I just recorded (me playing and singing “This Boy”). When the choruses came, I sang one harmony along with the boom box, then listened to the result. A bit of hiss, but otherwise it was me playing guitar and singing harmony with myself! Then I played THAT tape and sang a second harmony with it as I recorded with the my tape recorder. The result was MAGIC!!! I actually had to stop several times and start over because I was laughing so hard as I sang a 3rd harmony WITH MYSELF. I was hooked.
Of course I carried the tape with me everywhere I went and forced all my friends to listen. Most of them actually did. The “hiss” noise was really awful too. You used to get quite a lot of hiss just recording ONE TIME on those cassettes. Just imagine that multiplied by 3! But I didn’t care. I had made my first “multi-track recording,” plus caused some sort of psychological damage, I think. Hearing 3 of myself at the same time coming out of a machine was just….different. Actually, that explains a lot, now that I think of it. Oh well. Water under the bridge now. What’s done is done;).
So, do you want to sing harmony with yourself? With no hiss? Thanks to the computer age, you can! And you probably won’t need to buy any equipment. Learn how with our tutorials here.
More embarrassing (and hopefully amusing) stories to come! Until then…
Cheers!
Ken